With hundreds of supposed Ripper letters having been received throughout the timeline of the infamous murders, officials were able to conclude with reasonable certainty that not all were the work of the killer. Journalists were suspected of penning fakes, while others were sent in by mischievous fraudsters following the publication of the first four letters by police. Whereas now, technology and techniques have evolved to help sort the fact from the fiction, back in Victorian London these were not around and, thus, police had to rely on much more basic methods.
Following analysis on 209 Jack the Ripper letters conducted at the University of Manchester in 2018, most were found to have been written by different people and, therefore, labelled as hoaxes.
Separating Fact from Fiction
However, there are some which have been considered as genuine over the last 130 years and a considerable amount of research and debate has focused on these letters. It is these letters that are most worth the attention and have captured the imagination of Ripperologists for more than a century in an attempt to piece together one of the most infamous murder mysteries in the United Kingdom, if not the world.
Our casebook looks at these particular letters and leaves it open for you to decide whether they are genuine or not. Were these letters penned by one of history’s most infamous villains, toying with the press and police, or are they simply nothing more than the presentation of someone’s sick fantasy which, ultimately, helped the killer to avoid justice for the heinous crimes committed?